You may object saying that at the time passed the boards could acquire new BIOS versions, new drivers etc. What other attractive features does this chipset have? Sandy Bridge Trying out the new method. Well, it’s a Tualatin support. And now this chipset doesn’t only exist on paper:
|Date Added:||22 June 2007|
|File Size:||10.94 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The low-level test of the memory subsystem efficiency – Cachemem – reveals the reasons.
Asus TUA Manuals
Conclusion Well, ASUS didn’t want to be out of the game and thus released a DDR chipset for the Socket platform, like 3 other manufacturers of chipsets for x86 platforms. The sound subsystem is, however, absent. Sandy Bridge Trying out the new method. What other attractive features does this chipset have? I suppose other board makers have the same price ratio. And I can’t say they are wrong.
Well, it’s a Tualatin support.
You may object saying that at the time passed the boards could acquire new BIOS versions, new drivers etc. That is why the tests will demonstrate the performance of exactly the chipset rather than of the board. And you will hardly face any problems caused by usage of one chipset instead of another.
BioShock Infinite and Metro: From the performance viewpoint, the SiS looks more attractive, but here everything depends on a manufacturer. The chipset manufacturers are well aware of it and do not place production of this chipsets into the first position.
As for differences between these chipsets, I think they are not critical. The performance is not striking.
ASUS TUA266 Motherboard
Asus TUA266 Manuals
As for the board, there is also nothing bad that we could say about it. Write a comment below.
Taking these facts into consideration I assume that today we have gathered all chipsets which will awus be released for the Socket platform. ASUS is known tus266 a company that squeezes out a chipset to get the highest performance possible. Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: But as a matter of fact, it has an older architecture than the SiS – almost every manufacturer has refused a PCI bus as a connecting link between bridges.
The product is not sensational, but its characteristics are rather good: Well, in this case no changes were noticed, that is why we have taken old results for three boards from the review mentioned above. Besides, there is a definite group of users who are guided by exactly the name of a manufacturer rather than by the speed and accessories of a board. Its major competitor is probably the SiS And now this chipset doesn’t only exist on paper: On the other hand, the price difference between PC and PC may be smoothed out very soon.